Legal Opinion

Agovino v. Kunze

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1960No. Civ. 24191PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

Plaintiff, a passenger in an automobile driven by Betsy Parker, sued for damages for injuries sustained in a collision between her car and one driven by Gary Miner. The automobile driven by defendant Richard Kunze at no time came in contact with the Parker vehicle. Plaintiff predicated her claim on the theory that at the time of the collision defendant and Gary Miner, two minors, were racing their cars north on Laurel Grove Avenue and that, although defendant’s car did not come in contact with the one in which she was riding, his conduct was negligent and the proximate cause of the accident.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Mosley v. Arden Farms Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Marchetti v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sindell v. Abbott LaboratoriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Varas v. Barco Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Sparks v. City of ComptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Bierczynski v. RogersSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  5. Chavers v. Gatke Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API