Legal Opinion

In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, Loftus

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1992No. SB-88-0010-D. Disc. Comm. Nos. 5-2104, 86-1311, 86-1346, 87-0979PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHELLEY, Court of Appeals Judge * , Division One.

The Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court (Commission) recommended that William C. Loftus (Respondent) be suspended for a period of two years with credit for time spent on voluntary suspension. Respondent filed a timely appeal from the recommendations of the Commission. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 53(e), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law in Arizona in 1962. He later began abusing alcohol and, as a result, neglected his law practice. The State…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re LincolnArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, MorrisArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Matter of HooverArizona Supreme Court · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re PeasleyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re SchollArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Matter of HorwitzArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Matter of ArrickArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re AugensteinArizona Supreme Court · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API