Legal Opinion

Matter of Horwitz

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1994No. SB-93-0056-DPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Chief Justice.

This bar disciplinary action began after Richard Alan Horwitz was convicted of two counts of negligent homicide. As a result of these convictions, this court placed Horwitz on interim suspension from the practice of law. Rule 52(c), Ariz.R.Sup.Ct. (hereinafter “Rule_”). This court’s Disciplinary Commission (“Commission”) recommended that Horwitz be disbarred, and he filed a timely notice of appeal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rules 46(a) and 53(e) and Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3).

In bar disciplinary proceedings, this court is an independent trier of fact and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against CurranWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Matter of SwartzArizona Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re PeasleyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re: Michael J. HoareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. In Re SchollArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In Re MoakArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re ZawadaArizona Supreme Court · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API