Legal Opinion

Matter of Hoover

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1987No. SB-86-0033-DPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.

The State Bar of Arizona charged respondent Charles D. Hoover, a lawyer, with violations of the Code of Professional Responsibility adopted by this court. See Former Rule 29(a), Ariz.R.S.Ct., 17A A.R.S. (Supp.1984-85). 1 Respondent admitted violating the Code, but claimed that his infractions were the product of a mental disease. After hearing evidence, including expert testimony, a Local Administrative Committee (Committee) 2 assigned to Hoover’s case by the Disciplinary Commission (Commission) 3 of this court recommended that respondent not be disciplined because…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. SchantzArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Grove v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. In Re a Member of State Bar of Arizona RileyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re BeckmannSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Matter of MarquardtArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BuschSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. In Re JettArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In Re SchollArizona Supreme Court · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API