Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Augenstein

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1994No. SB-92-0065-DPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Justice.

On October 16,1992, the Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Arizona (Commission) issued its report recommending that Steven Todd Augenstein (respondent) be suspended from the practice of law for 2 years. We have jurisdiction to consider this matter pursuant to rule 53(e), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.

Factual and Procedural Background

On May 8, 1991, the State Bar of Arizona (State Bar) filed a formal complaint against respondent charging him with 3 counts of violating rules 42 and 51, Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court. The complaint pertained to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Matter of NevilleArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Evenstad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, KerstingArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In Re LincolnArizona Supreme Court · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re PeasleyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In the Matter Of: The Hon. Stephen O. Callaghan, Judge-Elect of the 28th CircuitWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. In Re MoakArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re AbramsArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. DistelSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API