Legal Opinion
Marone v. City of Waterbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 10, 1998No. SC 15659PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff is entitled to retroactive recalculation of disability benefits awarded pursuant to what is commonly referred to as the Heart and Hypertension Act (act), General Statutes § § 7-433c and 7-433b (b),2 following this court’s decision in Szudora v. Fairfield, 214 *3Conn. 552, 573 A.2d 1 (1990), in which we expanded the definition of maximum cumulative “weekly compensation” available under § 7-433b (b) to include overtime payments. Id., 559. Prior to the decision in that case, the plaintiff here had been receiving benefits in *4…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- National Labor Relations Board v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Dowling v. SlotnikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. HamptonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.