Lopa v. Brinker International, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
The sole question presented in this certified appeal is whether the United States Postal Service (postal service) is an employer for purposes of the workers’ compensation act (act), General Statutes § 31-275 et seq., particularly in the context of General Statutes § 31-310 of the act, which sets forth the method for determining the average weekly wage of an employee who worked for more than one employer at the time of injury.1 The plaintiff, Lynn Lopa, *428appeals 2 from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the decision of the workers’ compensation review board…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Cleveland v. U.S. Printing Ink, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Housing Authority v. DorseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Tayco Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- City of Norwich v. Housing Authority of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Soto v. Bushmaster Firearms International, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Bennett v. New Milford Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Connecticut Podiatric Medical Ass'n v. Health Net of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Kuchta v. ArisianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Williams v. Hous. Auth. of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.