Legal Opinion

Batte-Holmgren v. Commissioner of Public Health

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 13, 2007No. SC 17505PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VERTEFEUILLE, J.

The plaintiffs,1 who are owners of businesses affected by recently enacted legislation banning smoking in restaurants and cafés, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered after the granting of a motion to strike the complaint filed by the defendants, the commissioner of public health and the *280attorney general. The plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of the legislation, arguing that the smoking ban violates the equal protection clauses of the state and federal constitutions.2 The dispositive issues on appeal are: (1) whether this court has subject matter…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Hodel v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Horton v. MeskillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. American Legion Post No. 149 v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  5. Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API