State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Groshon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, V.C.J.
T1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record 1 submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint and of its disposition? and (2) Is a public censure and the payment of costs associated with this proceeding an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent's breach of professional discipline? We answer both questions in the affirmative.
I
INTRODUCTION TO THE RECORD
12 The Oklahoma Bar Association (OBA) charged Robert F. Groshon, Jr. (Groshon or respondent), a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. StubblefieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. KinseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- State v. TorresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. BeasleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.