Legal Opinion
State v. Torres
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 24, 2004No. 96,996PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, V.C.J.
¶ 1 The dispositive issues tendered on cer-tiorari are:. (1) Is appellant entitled to corrective relief from a bond forfeiture on grounds arising out of postjudgment events? and (2) Is there competent evidence in the appellate record to demonstrate that the trial court abused its discretion when it denied relief from the bond forfeiture? We answer both questions in the negative.
I
ANATOMY OF LITIGATION
12 On 11 September 2000, Pablo Torres (defendant) was charged .in the District Court, Tulsa County, with the crime of rape by instrumentation. Thomas Bouldin, a licensed bondsman…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Darrow v. Integris Health, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- IN RE: INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 397, STATE QUESTION NO. 767Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- Warren v. StanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- City of Enid v. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.