State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WATT, Chief Justice:
¶ 1 The Complainant, Oklahoma Bar Association (the Bar), filed a complaint against Respondent, Phillip John Anderson, a licensed attorney in Oklahoma, pursuant to Rule 6, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App. 1-A., for violations of the Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct (ORPC), 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App. 3-A.
¶ 2 The Bar alleged Respondent committed specific acts of professional misconduct in three counts of the complaint. In each count, the Bar alleged Respondent violated Rule 1.3, RGDP,1 and Rule 8.4, ORPC.2 In *328the complaint,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GasawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GroshonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SopherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. WolfeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. WilburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. PacenzaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. DEMOPOLOSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Association v. GarrettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.