State v. Voncannon
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
Defendant has brought forth thirteen assignments of error. In reviewing defendant’s conviction, we must first address defend*638ant’s argument that the trial court erred when it denied defendant’s motions to dismiss the case. We find there was sufficient evidence of felonious larceny for the case to be submitted to the jury and that defendant’s motions to dismiss as of nonsuit were correctly denied.
The evidence taken in the light most favorable to the State tends to show that defendant went to the home of his sister and her husband on 5 June 1979 at approximately 10:30 p.m. Defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Jencks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. HardySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. EppleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Loy v. Lorm Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BrewerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
- Everhart v. LeBrunCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. LukerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.