Legal Opinion

State v. Hardy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 14, 1977No. 23PublishedCited by 151 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

Defendants, through counsel, moved the Court to quash the indictments against them on the ground that there was arbitrary and systematic exclusion of blacks, women, and 18 through 21 year olds from the grand and petit juries. Defendants claim the court erred by ruling that there was no evidence of arbitrary or systematic exclusion of certain classes of people from the grand or petit juries and by denying their motions to quash. In this assignment of error, we are concerned with the grand jury selection process in Burke County, the county where the bills of indictment were…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by151 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. State v. JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. State v. BraxtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API