Legal Opinion

State v. Luker

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 20, 1983No. 8318SC109PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

It is a cardinal principle of criminal law that an indigent defendant has the right under the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution to assistance of counsel for his defense. Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 92 S.Ct. 2006, 32 L.Ed. 2d 530 (1972); Gideon v. Wainright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed. 2d 799 (1963); State v. Hutchins, 303 N.C. 321, 279 S.E. 2d 788 (1981); see also N.C. Const. Art. I, § 23.

Upon defendant’s affidavit of indigency in the case at bar, counsel was appointed on 4 March 1982. Counsel represented defendant for approximately six…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. AliSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. McDowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. State v. WellsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API