Legal Opinion

Everhart v. LeBrun

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1981No. 8018SC981PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

Defendant first assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motions for directed verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. It contends evidence of its negligence was insufficient to go to the jury or, in the alternative, that the evidence established contributory negligence as a matter of law.

Motions for directed verdict pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(a) and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 50(b) test the legal sufficiency of the evidence to take the case to the jury and support a verdict for the party opposing the motion.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  2. Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. NorburnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Graham v. North Carolina Butane Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Hunt v. Montgomery Ward and Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. State v. VoncannonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Wallace Ex Rel. Magers v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Koonce v. MayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Smith v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. McMurray v. Surety Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  5. Ferguson v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API