State v. Eppley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
In these cases the State relies upon what is called the doctrine of recent possession. While inaccurately named, the doctrine is well established and was thus stated by Chief Justice Pearson in State v. Graves, 72 N.C. 482: “When goods are stolen, one found in possession so soon thereafter, that he could not have reasonably got the possession unless he had stolen them himself, the law presumes he was the thief.” A better statement of the rule is that the defendant’s possession of stolen goods soon after the theft is a circumstance tending to show the defendant is guilty of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Gregg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- State v. WincklerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. MainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. Ysut MloSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
- State v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. AlfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.