Legal Opinion

Loy v. Lorm Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1981No. 801SC771PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECTON, Judge.

At the outset, it is important to emphasize that Lorm and Marl were closely-held corporations in which all three defendants were shareholders, directors and officers. The two corporations were formed at the same time with the same purpose —to establish the Port 0’ Call Restaurant. 2 The corporations had interlocking directorates with the three defendants firmly in control of both corporations. Plaintiff sued the three defendants in their capacities as shareholders, directors and officers of both corporations. Because of the multiple relationships shared by the three defendants…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. DeeseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. Snyder v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Freese v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  3. Farndale Co., LLC v. GibelliniCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  4. Medtronic, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Convacare, Inc. Scoop, (Special Care of Our Patients) Inc. Robert G. Johnson, Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Allentown Ambassadors, Inc. v. Northeast American Baseball, LLC (In Re Allentown Ambassadors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API