Legal Opinion

Wellman v. Conroy

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1920No. Civ. No. 2112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The action was brought by the assignee of the lessor for the recovery of rent upon an alleged lease of personal property, and judgment was for plaintiff. The written instrument under which defendant took possession and continued for some time in the use of said property was executed December 27, 1913. On September 15, 1914, Conroy assigned all his interest in said contract and in the property to a partnership composed of George H. Forster and Elmer Stoner, who in writing agreed to “assume all liability on the said contract or lease, agreeing to perform all the terms and conditions thereof as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Van Allen v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. McCollough v. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Brosnan v. KramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Perkins v. MettlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Muncy v. BrainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Strei v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. People v. One 1955 Buick 2-Door CoupeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Garcia & Maggini Co. v. ColvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Watson v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
  5. Watson v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API