Garcia & Maggini Co. v. Colvin
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of non-suit in an action to recover damages for defendants’ failure to deliver prunes under a written contract of sale between plaintiff corporation, by its agent, Charles H. McDermott, and defendant Peter Colvin. By said contract, which was made March 22, 1919, about the beginning of the blossoming season, the former agreed to purchase and the latter agreed to sell forty tons of dried prunes, at ten cents per pound base, constituting the 1919 prune crop raised on the Colvin ranch, in Sonoma County, which the contract recites is the sole and absolute property…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harris v. San Diego Flume Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
- Montgomery v. DornCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Armstrong v. BarcelouxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Post v. City and County BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Wellman v. ConroyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- W. H. Blodgett Co. v. Bebe Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- J. M. Wildman, Inc. v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Central Savings Bank v. CoulterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- E. K. Wood Lumber Co. v. Moore Mill & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Metcalf v. GuercioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925