Legal Opinion
Strei v. Brooks
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 1928No. Docket No. 5894PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The above actions, which involve claims for rent under the same lease but covering different periods, were tried together, and both appeals are presented on the same record.
The deceased, W. E. Strei, and U. S. Johnson were lessees from John McCaslin of a certain store building in the city of Oakland. On November 29, 1922, they sublet the premises by a lease in writing to defendants C. Earl Brooks and R. G. Bartlett for the term of four years and eleven months at a monthly rental of $225. The rent has been paid in full to March 1, 1926, and in addition $50 was paid on account of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Welcome v. HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Samuels v. OttingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Bradbury v. HigginsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Brosnan v. KramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gold Mining & Water Co. v. SwinertonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Gruman v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Tolle v. StruveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Pacific Queen Fisheries v. L. Symes, Pacific Queen Fisheries v. Atlas Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Lindley v. SaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.