Legal Opinion
Shultz Steel Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 26, 1986No. B016361PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUIZ, J. *
Plaintiff and appellant Shultz Steel Company (hereinafter Shultz) appeals from an entry of a summary judgment against it and in favor of defendant and respondent Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company (hereinafter Hartford), wherein the trial judge found “no triable issue of any material fact raised with respect to the issue of whether a relevant duty is owed by Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, ...” Judgment is affirmed.
Factual and Procedural Background
Shultz has a factory located in Los Angeles County where it manufactures certain steel products on its premises.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Barbara A. v. John G.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Frazier, Dame, Doherty, Parrish & Hanawalt v. Boccardo, Blum, Lull, Niland, Teerlink & BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Insurance Company v. McCainSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Desai v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Northland Insurance Company v. Guardsman Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Murillo v. Rite Stuff Foods, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Ronald A. Baptist v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Paper Savers, Inc. v. NacsaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.