Legal Opinion

Desai v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1996No. B093653PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BOREN, P. J.

An insured sued his real property insurer and insurance agent for breach of contract and negligence, claiming that the defendants failed and refused to provide him with the 100 percent replacement cost coverage he had requested and which the agent assured him he was receiving. On demurrer, the trial court concluded that the insured could not state a cause of action against his insurer because the policy limits were less than the cost of replacing structures destroyed by an earthquake and fire. We conclude that the reasonable expectations of the insured would be that he was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Reserve Insurance Co. v. PisciottaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Lavine v. JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Lippert v. BaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Lazar v. Hertz Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. MacEy v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
  3. Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. R & B Auto Center, Inc. v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Butcher v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API