Legal Opinion

Barbara A. v. John G.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 26, 1983No. Civ. 50953PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*373Opinion

BARRY-DEAL, J.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether a woman (appellant) suffering injuries from an ectopic pregnancy1 has a cause of action in tort against the responsible man (respondent) for his misrepresentations of infertility. The trial court ruled that no cause of action would lie and granted respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. We reverse the judgment.

I. Procedural Background

Respondent, an attorney, filed an action in municipal court against appellant for $1,520 in fees for representing her in a family law matter. Appellant filed her answer and a…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Destefano v. GrabrianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Pierce v. LymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Osborn v. Irwin Memorial Blood BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Garcia v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Das v. Bank of America, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2010

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API