Travelers Fire Insurance v. Brock & Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J. pro tem.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendant after trial by the court sitting without a jury. From the record it appears that plaintiff’s assignors, Joe and Mary Brandt, who were husband and wife, delivered to defendant, which was engaged in the jewelry-business, a diamond brooch from which a small stone had been lost, for the purpose of having it repaired by replacing the lost stone. Defendant, not having a diamond which would fit the brooch, delivered it to E. & I. Woorgaft & Company, a diamond dealer, which furnished a diamond and in turn delivered the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
- United Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Erlin v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Haase v. Central Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Swarzwald v. CooleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- H.S. Crocker Co., Inc. v. McFaddinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Gold v. GibbonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Higbee Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947
- McCaffrey v. CroninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Sacramento County Retired Employees Ass'n v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.