Legal Opinion

Travelers Fire Insurance v. Brock & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 21, 1941No. Civ. 12595PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendant after trial by the court sitting without a jury. From the record it appears that plaintiff’s assignors, Joe and Mary Brandt, who were husband and wife, delivered to defendant, which was engaged in the jewelry-business, a diamond brooch from which a small stone had been lost, for the purpose of having it repaired by replacing the lost stone. Defendant, not having a diamond which would fit the brooch, delivered it to E. & I. Woorgaft & Company, a diamond dealer, which furnished a diamond and in turn delivered the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. United Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Erlin v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Haase v. Central Union High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Swarzwald v. CooleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. H.S. Crocker Co., Inc. v. McFaddinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. Gold v. GibbonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Higbee Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. McCaffrey v. CroninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Sacramento County Retired Employees Ass'n v. County of SacramentoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API