Erlin v. National Union Fire Insurance
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EDMONDS, J., pro tem.
The effect of the reversal of a judgment by this court without further order or direction to the trial court is the sole question presented by this appeal.
Plaintiff recovered judgment in the superior court. The defendant appealed and this court reversed the judgment. (Erlin v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., 217 Cal. 374 [18 Pac. (2d) 660].) Plaintiff thereafter brought the ease on. for trial in the superior court, which refused to hear it. The judgment entered for the defendant recites: “that the Supreme Court of the State of California did not intend to grant said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mattingly v. PennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Central Savings Bank of Oakland v. LakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Monson v. FischerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Erlin v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by34 opinions
- Richfield Oil Corp. v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. CarswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Wells v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.