Swarzwald v. Cooley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
This action involves two adjacent beach lots in Laguna Beach. The owners sued each other to establish the length of their common lateral boundary. This is the second appeal. At the first trial, defendant Cooley had judgment on his cross-complaint, fixing the length of said common boundary at 376 feet. On appeal, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment, Swarzwald v. Cooley, 220 Cal. 438 [31 Pac. (2d) 381]. In its opinion, the Supreme Court thus defined the issues: “The record shows an action by plaintiffs Swarzwald and a cross-action by defendant Cooley, both in form to quiet title and to…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- England v. Hospital of the Good SamaritanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Danielson v. SykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Slovick v. James I. Barnes Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Kytasty v. GodwinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Travelers Fire Insurance v. Brock & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- People v. William Kent Estate Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Clayton v. SchultzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.