Legal Opinion

Gomez v. Lincare, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 2009No. G040338PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FYBEL, J.

Introduction

Defendant Lineare, Inc. (Lineare), provides respiratory services and medical equipment setup to patients in their homes. Plaintiffs Jose Gomez, Daniel Gutierrez, and Donny Talbot (collectively, plaintiffs) were service representatives for Lineare. Their job duties included driving vans containing liquid oxygen and compressed oxygen, which are defined by the federal government as hazardous materials. In addition to their regular, eight-hour workdays, plaintiffs regularly worked on call in the evenings and on weekends.

Plaintiffs sued Lineare to recover unpaid…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Saelzler v. Advanced Group 400California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Sav-On Drug Stores, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  2. Augustus v. ABM Security ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Corbin v. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  4. Troester v. Starbucks CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Tan v. Grubhub, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2016

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API