Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided August 18, 2016No. Case No. 13-cv-03826-EMC, Case No. 15-cv-00262-EMCPublishedCited by 131 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
O’Connor, Docket No. 518
Yucesoy, Docket No. 206
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge
I- INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs brought the instant class action and putative class action against Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc., alleging that Uber miselassifies drivers as independent contractors rather than employees. O’Connor v. Uber Techs., Inc., Case No. 13-cv-3826-EMC, Docket No. 330 (Second Amended Complaint) (SAC) at ¶ 3; Yucesoy v. Uber Techs., Inc., Case No. 15-cv-262-EMC, Docket No. 198 (Fourth Amended Complaint) (FAC) at ¶ 2. Following…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- General Motors Corp. v. RomeinSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- Haralson v. U.S. Aviation Servs. Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Flores v. Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Abdul Jamil v. Workforce Resources, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Agustin Benitez v. Western Milling, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Alabsi v. Savoya, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.