Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Corbin v. Time Warner Entertainment-Advance/Newhouse Partnership

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 2, 2016No. 13-55622PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BYBEE, Circuit Ju.dge:

This case turns on $15.02 and one minute. $15.02 represents the total amount of compensation that Plaintiff- Andre Corbin (“Corbin”) alleges he has lost due to his employer’s, Defendant Time Warner En-tertainmenfl-Advance/Newhouse Partnership (“TWEAN”), compensation policy that rounds all employee time stamps to the nearest quarter-hour. One minute represents the total amount of time for which Corbin alleges he was not compensated as he once mistakenly opened an auxiliary computer program before clocking into TWEAN’s timekeeping software platform. $15.02 in lost…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Simmons v. Navajo County, Ariz.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Balint v. Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. Cool Fuel, Incorporated v. William H. Connett, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Ted L. Lindow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Hardy v. Lewis Gale Medical Center, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2019
  2. Adeyanju v. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
  3. Aguilar v. Management & TrainingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  4. Silva v. See's Candy Shops, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. Gomez v. J. Jacobo Farm Labor Contractor, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API