Legal Opinion
Tan v. Grubhub, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 22, 2016No. Case No. 15-cv-05128-JSCPublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, United States Magistrate Judge
In this putative class action, Plaintiffs Andrew Tan (“Tan”) and Raef Lawson (“Lawson,” and together, “Plaintiffs”) sue Grub Hub Holdings Inc. and GrubHub Inc. (“GrubHub” or “Defendants”), a service that provides food delivery to customers via an on demand dispatch system. The gravamen of Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) is that the delivery driver plaintiffs were misclassified as independent contractors and denied the benefits of California wage-and-hour laws.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Jerry L. Branch, Valenna Branch, Colby Branch v. Dale L. Tunnell, Individually and as Special Agent of Bureau of Land Management, State of MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Julian v. Glenair, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Cleveland v. Groceryworks.com, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Albers v. Yarbrough World Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Albert Johnson v. R and L Carriers Shared Services, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Alberto Lopez v. Bellingham Marine Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.