Reclamation Dist. No. 673 v. Diepenbrock
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
This is an action to foreclose a lien for an assessment for reclamation purposes" on' defendants’ land. Judgment was in favor of the plaintiff and from said judgment defendants appeal.
The plaintiff in the complaint as originally filed was designated as “Swamp Land Reclamation District No. 673.” It developed at the trial that the true name of the corporation was “Reclamation District No. 673,” and on motion the court permitted the striking out of the first two words of the title of plaintiff as pleaded. This is assigned as error by appellants. In the answer defendants attacked the corporate…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Central Irrigation District v. De LappeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Best v. WohlfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Reclamation District No. 70 v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Nisbet v. Clio Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1905
- People v. HolladayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Morris v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1941
- Jacoby v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Thompson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Miller & Lux, Inc. v. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Meyer v. Reclamation District No. 17California Supreme Court · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.