Legal Opinion

Socol v. King

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1950No. L. A. 20832PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Plaintiff, as administratrix with the will annexed of the estate of her mother, Parasehiva Socol King, deceased, brought this action against decedent’s husband, Louis King, to quiet title to a one-half interest in certain real and personal property located in California. After judgment was entered in favor of defendant, plaintiff moved to set it aside and to enter a different judgment on the ground that the conclusions of law were erroneous and not consistent with the findings of fact (Code Civ. Proe., §663(1)). The motion was denied and plaintiff appealed from the judgment and from the order…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Tomaier v. TomaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Siberell v. SiberellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Viner v. UntrechtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Sears v. RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. In Re Marriage of LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Thomasset v. ThomassetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Woods v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Mears v. MearsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API