Legal Opinion

Morris v. Poundstone

California Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1937No. Sac. No. 5114PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Colusa County annulling a reapportionment by the board of supervisors of that county of assessment number 5 of Reclamation District No. 108, in so far as that assessment, as originally levied, affected tract number 109. Tract 109 contains 3,120 acres. In 1923 it was duly and properly assessed for assessment number 5 for $197,538.63. In 1925 bonds in the sum of over $3,000,000 were issued upon assessment number 5. Plaintiff is the holder and owner of some of these bonds, so secured.

The facts giving rise to the present controversy are…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. River Farms Co. v. California GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Morris v. Reclamation District No. 108California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Morris v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API