Legal Opinion

People v. Wignall

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 23, 1932No. Docket No. 68PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, Acting P. J.

In an information filed by the district attorney of San Bernardino County appellant was accused of the crimes of (1) forging the will of Charles Wellington Scott, deceased; (2) causing the forged will to be filed of record in the office of the county clerk of San Bernardino County; and (3) offering the forged will in evidence in a probate proceeding entitled, “In the matter of the Estate of Charles Wellington Scott, deceased.” In an amended information, in addition to these three accusations, appellant was charged with two prior convictions of felonies which he admitted. He was found guilty…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. MayenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. People v. LaparaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. People v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  4. People v. TesharaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. People v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. MerkourisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. ConternoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. People v. RomanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. CallihamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API