People v. Chapman
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los ■Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. Paul J. McCormick, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
By an indictment containing twelve counts, defendant, in each of six counts, was charged with the crime of obtaining money by false pretenses, as defined in section 532 of the Penal Code, and in each of the six remaining counts he was charged with the crime of embezzlement. He was acquitted of the embezzlement charges and convicted on each of the counts charging him with the crime of obtaining money by false pretenses, the jury returning a separate verdict on each count. On four of the verdicts finding defendant guilty of obtaining money by false pretenses, namely, on the verdicts finding him…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. O'BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. LaparaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- People v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- State v. ShaefferSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886
- People v. BotkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. BuffumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Haney v. TakakuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Kruse v. White BrothersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.