Legal Opinion
People v. Conterno
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 1959No. Crim. A. 3981PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavid, J.
The jury’s verdict declared defendant Conterno guilty of violation of California Vehicle Code, section 502: “It is unlawful for any person who is under the influence of intoxicating liquor to drive a vehicle upon any highway . . ; and upon a second count of the complaint, found that he was guilty of operating a vehicle upon a public high*Supp. 822way without having in his possession and displaying upon demand a valid license, etc., in contravention of Vehicle Code, section 274, subdivision (b).
The judgment of the court was that the defendant on the first count should pay a fine in the sum of…
2Cases cited84 opinions
- People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
- Finley v. OrrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- American Fork City v. CrosgroveUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Bettie Jane Newhouse v. John Misterly, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.