Legal Opinion

People v. Mayen

California Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1922No. Crim. No. 2388PublishedCited by 155 opinions

The facts, are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of grand larceny and of attempted grand larceny.

The case is before us upon an order for hearing in-the supreme court after judgment of reversal in division two of the second district court of appeal.

The important point in issue and upon which the district court of appeal set aside the verdict and reversed the judgment of the trial court arose upon the admission in evidence, on the trial, of certain incriminating articles of personal property which had been taken from the apartments of defendant without his consent under the authority of an…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by155 opinions

  1. Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People v. DeforeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Burrows v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API