Legal Opinion

People v. Calliham

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 17, 1947No. Crim. 4117PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Having been convicted by the court of robbery and of assault with intent to commit rape, defendant seeks a reversal of the judgment on the grounds that no force was applied in the robbery and no resistance was made to the rape; that is, the evidence is not sufficient proof of the crimes.

The prosecutrix testified that about 12:30 o’clock on a Sunday morning, as she was walking on Hooper Avenue in Los Angeles on the way to visit her brother, she was grabbed around the neck and pulled backward to a dark place behind some garages. The man laid her backward, pulled off her slacks and pants, zipped…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. People v. LarriosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Rice v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  5. People v. SellasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. FavorsArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. People v. BlankenshipCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. People v. GoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. LintCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. RenekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API