Legal Opinion

Sain v. Ara Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided July 26, 1983PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GODDARD, Judge.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether the Trial Court erred in holding that as a matter of law ARA Manufacturing Company would be liable if the jury found Auto Air of Macon negligent in repairing an air conditioner in the Plaintiff’s van which resulted in a fire and extensive damage to the vehicle.

The Plaintiff purchased a new stripped-down Dodge van in May 1980. An air conditioner manufactured by the Defendant was installed shortly thereafter. The Plaintiff experienced difficulty with the performance of the air conditioner from the beginning and attempted to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. D. M. Rose & Co. v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Nidiffer v. Clinchfield RailroadCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  3. Howard v. HavenTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  4. National Life & Accident Ins. v. MorrisonTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Electric Light Co. v. Gas Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Trinity Industries, Inc. v. McKinnon Bridge Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  2. State Ex Rel. Sizemore v. United Physicians Insurance Risk Retention GroupCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
  3. Ham v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
  4. Lott v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, INC.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
  5. Broadnax v. Swift Transportation Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API