Legal Opinion

Ham v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided March 17, 2010No. Case 2:09-cv-02145PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Swift Transportation Co., Inc.’s (“Swift”) Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (b)(6) filed on August 26, 2009. (D.E.#43.) Plaintiffs Michael Ham et al. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a response in opposition on November 8, 2009, and Swift filed a reply on November 25, 2009. For the reasons stated below, Swift’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND 1

Plaintiffs Michael D. Ham and Jemonia L. Ham are residents of the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In re Syngenta AG MIR 162 Corn LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015
  2. Town of Smyrna v. Municipal Gas AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015
  3. Ladd Landing, LLC v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2012
  4. SPO Go Holdings, Inc. v. W & O Construction Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2016
  5. Brian Carrico, Kacie Carrico, Don Gatlin, and Dora Gatlin v. Uponor, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API