Ham v. SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO., INC.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
BERNICE BOUIE DONALD, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Swift Transportation Co., Inc.’s (“Swift”) Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and (b)(6) filed on August 26, 2009. (D.E.#43.) Plaintiffs Michael Ham et al. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed a response in opposition on November 8, 2009, and Swift filed a reply on November 25, 2009. For the reasons stated below, Swift’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND 1
Plaintiffs Michael D. Ham and Jemonia L. Ham are residents of the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re Syngenta AG MIR 162 Corn LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2015
- Town of Smyrna v. Municipal Gas AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015
- Ladd Landing, LLC v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2012
- SPO Go Holdings, Inc. v. W & O Construction Co.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2016
- Brian Carrico, Kacie Carrico, Don Gatlin, and Dora Gatlin v. Uponor, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.