Legal Opinion
Howard v. Haven
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided June 10, 1955PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil
delivered the opinion of the Court.'
The complainants, Howard, Clark and Atchley, are engaged in business in Cleveland, Tennessee, under the name of City Electric Service. They filed their original bill in the Chancery Court against the defendants, James H. Haven, a resident of Bradley County, Tennessee, and five other co-defendants, naming them, seeking an injunction to restrain them from interfering with the complainants in their right to perform a contract for the erection of a. hospital in Cleveland, Tennessee.
The bill charges that the complainants had entered into a contract with L. A.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Local Union No. 10, United Ass'n of Journeymen Plumbers & Steamfitters v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- D. B. Loveman Co. v. BaylessTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
- Electric Light Co. v. Gas Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- C. M. Keys Commission Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by45 opinions
- Givens v. Mullikin Ex Rel. McElwaneyTennessee Supreme Court · 2002
- White v. Revco Discount Drug Centers, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Brungard v. Caprice Records, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Linda Sue Edwards v. Travelers Insurance of Hartford, Connecticut, P. v. Jackson, III v. Travelers Insurance of Hartford, Connecticut, P. v. Jackson, III v. Travelers Insurance of Hartford, ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Kerney v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.