Legal Opinion
Small v. Going Forward, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 20, 2007No. SC 17522PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*419 Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether General Statutes § 14-62, and specifically § 14-62 (a) (9),1 imposes a “reasonable cost” limitation on the amount that an automobile dealer may charge as a “conveyance fee” for processing documentation or “performing services related to the closing of a sale . . . .” The plaintiff, Dyvon Small, appeals, following our grant of certification,2 from the judgment of the Appellate Court answering a reserved question in favor of the defendant, Going Forward, Inc., and concluding that § 14-62 (a) (9) imposes disclosure…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Peck v. JacqueminSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- United Illuminating Co. v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Eder Bros. v. Wine Merchants of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Felician Sisters of St. Francis of Connecticut, Inc. v. Historic District CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Testa v. GeressySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- American Promotional Events, Inc. v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- In re William D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. CashmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.