Legal Opinion
Testa v. Geressy
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 1, 2008No. SC 17970PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
This appeal requires us to consider the statutory authority of the office of the attorney general (state) to appear and plead in proceedings before a family support magistrate to enforce a child support order. The plaintiff, Steven Testa, appeals 1 from the judgment of the trial court, Hon. JohnR. Caruso, judge trial referee, denying the plaintiffs appeal from the decision of the family support magistrate, Harris T. Lifshitz, which denied the plaintiffs motion to vacate the Connecticut registration of a child support order that originally had been issued in the state of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Powell v. Infinity InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Cruz v. MontanezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- In Re Jose B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Sastrom v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Doe v. Boy Scouts of America Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.