Legal Opinion
Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Cashman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 28, 2007No. SC 17741PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The plaintiff, Southern New England Telephone Company, appeals from the judgment of the trial court affirming the declaratory ruling of the named defendant,1 Shaun B. Cashman, the commissioner of labor (commissioner), regarding the application of the Connecticut family and medical leave law, General Statutes § 31-51kk et seq. (family and medical leave law), *646to the sick leave policy set forth in the collective bargaining agreement between the plaintiff and its employees. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly affirmed the commissioner’s ruling that an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Teresa T. v. RagagliaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Friezo v. FriezoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Renaissance Management Co. v. Connecticut Housing Finance AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Graff v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Tracy v. Scherwitzky Gutter Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Luurtsema v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- C. R. Klewin Northeast, LLC v. FlemingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Jim's Auto Body v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Dias v. GradySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.