Legal Opinion
Berringer v. Krueger
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 20, 1924No. Civ. No. 2745PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover from the defendant the sum of $859.56, an alleged balance due the plaintiff for work and labor performed by him for the defendant.
The answer consisted merely of specific denials of the allegations of the complaint, which is in the usual or ordinary form for the recovery of wages or debt for wages.
Judgment was awarded plaintiff for the sum of $705.66. This appeal is by the defendant from said judgment.
There is no contention in the briefs that the plaintiff is not entitled to the compensation for which he sues. The defendant’s contention is that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Iwanaga v. HagopianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Miner v. RickeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
3Cited by5 opinions
- Engineering Service Corp. v. Longridge Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Engineering Etc. Corp. v. Longridge Inv. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Mirabile v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Lindsey v. Commercial Discount Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- McDevitt v. Chas. Corriea & Bros.California Court of Appeal · 1924