Iwanaga v. Hagopian
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. George E. Church, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment by default, the defendants declining to answer after order overruling their demurrer to the complaint.
From that pleading it appears that the plaintiffs had obtained a judgment against Albert D. Hagopian for work and labor performed, and that subsequently, in attempting to satisfy such judgment in proceedings supplementary to execution, they learned for the first time that J as. D. and Baxter D. Hagopian were copartners of Albert in the enterprise upon which the plaintiffs’ labor had been performed. It also appears from the complaint that the said judgment is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wood v. WatkinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
- Erwin v. ScottenIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Bailey Loan Co. v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Dobbs v. PuringtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Kelly v. BandiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mirabile v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Vincent v. GraysonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- McRae v. BatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Berringer v. KruegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Hobgood v. GlassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.