Miner v. Rickey
California Court of Appeal
The facts are statéd in the opinion of the court. Parker & Parker, Alfred Chartz, Charles C. Boynton, and James F. Peck, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought for legal services and was tried before a jury. The verdict was in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $480.00. The appeal is from the judgment on a bill of exceptions.
The first point urged in the brief of appellant for reversal is based upon the ruling of the court in denying the motion to suspend the trial until the determination of another action pending in the circuit court of the United States. We understand, however, from the oral argument that appellant has abandoned this position and therefore we shall not discuss it.
Complaint is made of the refusal of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Harrison v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hansen v. BurfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Vilardo v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Cullinan v. McColganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- College National Bank v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Yankelewitch v. BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.