Legal Opinion

Mirabile v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1953No. Civ. 4579PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

The writ was directed to appellant, as judge of the municipal court, prohibiting him from proceeding further against Paul Mirabile, the defaulting defendant in a municipal court action (and who is the petitioner arid respondent in the instant preceding) until such time as the issues raised by the answers of other defendants in the municipal court action, who appeared by answer, are adjudicated.

The facts are that one Steiner, as an assignee for collection, brought an action in the municipal court upon a contract for the sale and delivery of matches to be delivered at stated intervals. A money…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rescue Army v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Fortenbury v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Cole v. Roebling Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Lynch v. BenciniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. A. G. Col Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Uranium Antitrust Litigation. Westinghouse Electric CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  2. Wheatley v. Carl Halvorson, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Kooper v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Marc Bellaire, Inc. v. FleischmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Adams Manufacturing & Engineering Co. v. Coast Centerless Grinding Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API