Legal Opinion

McDevitt v. Chas. Corriea & Bros.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1924No. Docket No. 2770Published

1Opinion

The appellant petitions for a rehearing, claiming, as he claimed in his briefs, that the record supports no other course by this court than that of ordering the court below to enter judgment in his favor. We thought our position on the proposition was made sufficiently clear in the former opinion. However, the case presents rather an unique situation and that there may be no misapprehension as to our views regarding the points discussed in the original opinion and renewed by the appellant in his petition, we will take the pains to restate them here.

As pointed out in the opinion originally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sprague v. WaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Ewing v. HaywardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Iwanaga v. HagopianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Berringer v. KruegerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API