Legal Opinion

Markstaller v. Markstaller

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1958No. 8595PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Justice.

Respondent Arnold Markstaller hereinafter is designated as respondent.

Appellant has appealed from a judgment of dismissal which resulted when the trial court sustained respondents’ demurrer to appellant’s complaint without leave to amend. Relevant alleged facts are hereinafter related.

December 30, 1955, appellant filed his complaint. He alleges the formation of a partnership about December 30, 1947, between himself and respondent under the name of “City Sanitary Service”; that said business was and is conducted pursuant to the terms of a contract with the City of Moscow whereby…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Richeson v. KesslerIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Cooper v. Wesco Builders, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Chambers v. McCollumIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Hall v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Foberg v. HarrisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Wickstrom v. North Idaho CollegeIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. City of Meridian v. PETRA Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Jones v. WatsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Clark v. OlsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Smith v. City of PrestonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API